The venture model is changing. Slowly—and then all at once.
Why small teams, capital efficiency, and sharp judgment are the new edge in VC
For years, venture was a scale game.
Raise fast. Burn fast. Grow faster.
And in a world of infinite margin and winner-take-all software, it worked.
But AI is rewriting the rules. Costs are higher. Margins are lower. Growth is faster—but not stickier.
And suddenly, the old playbook looks… dated.
The next generation of great investors won’t just write big checks.
They’ll back small teams with sharp thinking and unfair advantages—before the rest of the market catches on.
Here’s how the landscape is shifting—and what that means for how we invest.
Capital efficiency isn’t optional anymore—it’s a strategy
AI startups are expensive to start. GPUs, infra orchestration, fine-tuning—it adds up fast.
But oddly, many of these companies can reach revenue faster than ever before:
Distribution is faster (thanks to APIs and viral channels)
Headcount is leaner (thanks to LLM tools and agents)
Workflows are more automatable than ever
It’s a paradox: startups are costlier to start, but cheaper to scale.
In this world, capital efficiency isn’t a constraint.
It’s a tactical advantage.
Growth isn’t a moat anymore
The ability to grow fast used to signal strength. Now? It just signals competence.
Interoperability fuels go-to-market
Meme velocity is measured in minutes
Playbooks are open-source
Velocity is table stakes.
Defensibility is what matters.
The best founders won’t just grow—they’ll build feedback loops, stickiness, and edge.
The best funds won’t be the biggest
Software no longer scales on pure margin.
Founders are raising smaller rounds.
Startups can hit profitability early.
That makes it harder for large funds to play the early game—and easier for small, sharp funds to find outsized returns.
Faster decisions
Non-consensus checks
High ownership without overcapitalizing
Closer alignment with operators
The highest multiple returns may come from the smallest funds.
Small teams make better decisions
Groupthink kills edge.
You don’t need a Monday partner meeting to know if a founder’s exceptional.
You need a point of view—and the courage to act on it.
In a world of consensus filters, clarity is alpha.
Research is free. Insight is rare.
Everyone has access to the same surface data: market maps, funding rounds, AI trend reports.
The real edge?
Seeing early
Underwriting differently
Filtering noise from signal
The best investors don’t wait for consensus.
They move on patterns—and bet before the market has words for it.
Trust moves faster—but the bar is higher
Social media accelerates introductions.
Mutuals, proof of work, track records, and founder narratives are more visible than ever.
But visibility ≠ credibility.
In my first venture job, I learned: we wouldn’t back someone unless reference calls came back with one clear signal:
“This person is one of the most remarkable people I’ve ever worked with.”
That hasn’t changed. If anything, it matters more now.
Trust is still the most important currency in venture.
What’s changed is how we evaluate it—quickly, rigorously, and publicly.
We can build trust faster now. But we still have to earn it, verify it, and feel it in our gut.
The next generation of venture firms will look different
Smaller. Faster. Sharper.
More conviction, less consensus.
They’ll back founders who move fast and spend carefully.
Who compound trust and margin.
Who don’t just ride hype—they build loops.
And they’ll do it with less capital, fewer people, and better taste.
I’m building a firm around these principles.
If you are too—founder, investor, or operator—I’d love to connect.
You make some great points, and I agree AI is modifying how the VC community will look.
When I think of how venture changed, what comes to mind first is how cheaper it has become for startups to launch, with the help of AWS and other factors. This opened the door for more seed funding, which now ranges from pre-seed to post-seed rounds, making Series A more of a bridge to later rounds. And the expansion of seed also gave rise to microfunds and more sector-specific investors and solo GPs and many more emerging managers over the years, and it’s been great to see the diversity of the fund managers.
Venture has also changed on the other end, with the rise of late-stage and unicorn hunting and most of the large deals and large firms now are resembling their PE counterparts.
A huge change often overlooked is the evolving nature of the LP, as we see more HNWI and family offices come into play, helping give rise to all those great emerging managers. And now we see many more established GPs publicly supporting seed stage funds even though they are themselves in mammoth funds.
Another factor we’ve seen in recent decades is the growth of the platform, which I like to spotlight, and how entrepreneurs expect more services and not just capital. But that’s my POV.